The Indictment of Mary Queen of Scots as Derived From a Manuscript in the University Library at Cambridge Hitherto Unpublished. With Comments on the Authorship of the Manuscript and on its Connected D

The Indictment of Mary Queen of Scots presents a detailed examination of the charges against Mary Stuart, drawing from a previously unpublished manuscript held in the University Library at Cambridge. This meticulously researched work, edited and annotated by R.H. Mahon, delves into the historical context surrounding Mary’s trial and execution. The book includes thorough commentary on the authorship of the manuscript and analysis of related documents, offering readers a comprehensive understanding of the complex political landscape of 16th-century Scotland and England. Mahon’s scholarly approach sheds new light on the evidence presented against Mary, challenging existing interpretations and providing valuable insights into the motivations of her accusers. This volume is an essential resource for historians, researchers, and anyone interested in the life and legacy of one of history’s most enigmatic figures. 'The Indictment of Mary Queen of Scots' remains a significant contribution to the ongoing debate surrounding her guilt or innocence.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.